What if you could know that your unborn baby boy is likely to be sexually attracted to other boys? Beyond that, what if hormonal treatments could change the baby’s orientation to heterosexual? Would you do it? Some scientists believe that such developments are just around the corner. For some time now, scientists have been looking for a genetic or hormonal cause of sexual orientation. Thus far, no ‘gay gene’ has been found — at least not in terms of incontrovertible and accepted science. Yet, it is now claimed that a growing body of evidence indicates that biological factors may at least contribute to sexual orientation. The most interesting research along these lines relates to the study of sheep. Scientists at the U.S. Sheep Experiment Station are conducting research into the sexual orientation of sheep through ‘sexual partner preference testing.’ As William Saletan at Slate.com explains: A bare majority of rams turn out to be heterosexual. One in five swings both ways. About 15 percent are asexual, and 7 percent to 10 percent are gay. Why so many gay rams? Is it too much socializing with ewes? Same-sex play with other lambs? Domestication? Nope. Those theories have […]
Friday, March 16th, 2007
Is Your Baby Gay? What If You Could Know? What If You Could Do Something About It?
Author: Albert Mohler
Source: www.AlbertMohler.com
Publication Date: Friday, March 02, 2007 at 3:40 am ET
Link: Is Your Baby Gay? What If You Could Know? What If You Could Do Something About It?
Source: www.AlbertMohler.com
Publication Date: Friday, March 02, 2007 at 3:40 am ET
Link: Is Your Baby Gay? What If You Could Know? What If You Could Do Something About It?
Stephan: This is why religion should never dictate the terms of science. Faced with the growing evidence that homosexuality is physiologically based -- not a naughty life style choice -- this spokesman of the Religious Right proposes it is still immoral, and science should be shaped to acknowledge that certitude. Thanks to Amy McBride.