The quality of children’s health care in America varies widely from state to state, as does their access to insurance and care and the likelihood of living long and healthy lives. That’s the conclusion of a new scorecard produced by the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation that seeks to promote better health care for all Americans. According to the scorecard, if all states performed as well as the top few states: an additional 4.6 million children nationwide would have health insurance; 11.8 million more children would get their recommended yearly medical and dental check-ups; 10.9 million more children would have a ‘medical home’ — a regular source of care; 1.6 million fewer children would be at risk for developmental delays;and nearly 800,000 more children would be up-to-date on their vaccines. Iowa, Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire are the top performing states, according to the report, while Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Nevada and Texas are at the bottom. ‘States and the federal government have a very high stake in ensuring that children are healthy,’ Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis said during a teleconference Tuesday. ‘In fact, more than one-third of children in the […]
Thursday, May 29th, 2008
States’ Scorecard Finds Big Differences in Kids’ Health Care
Author: STEVEN REINBERG
Source: Washington Post
Publication Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008; 12:00 AM
Link: States’ Scorecard Finds Big Differences in Kids’ Health Care
Source: Washington Post
Publication Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008; 12:00 AM
Link: States’ Scorecard Finds Big Differences in Kids’ Health Care
Stephan: This is what is wrong with taking a states right approach to health care, which is what many conservatives propose we do. And what is one to say about a country that does not make its children's good health a national priority? Can one say it is civilized? I think not.