The author of an influential British government report arguing the world needed to spend just 1% of its wealth tackling climate change has warned that the cost of averting disaster has now doubled. Lord Stern of Brentford made headlines in 2006 with a report that said countries needed to spend 1% of their GDP to stop greenhouse gases rising to dangerous levels. Failure to do this would lead to damage costing much more, the report warned – at least 5% and perhaps more than 20% of global GDP. But speaking yesterday in London, Stern said evidence that climate change was happening faster than had been previously thought meant that emissions needed to be reduced even more sharply. This meant the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere would have to be kept below 500 parts per million, said Stern. In 2006, he set a figure of 450-550ppm. ‘I now think the appropriate thing would be in the middle of that range,’ he said. ‘To get below 500ppm … would cost around 2% of GDP.’ In a recent report for the London School of Economics, Stern acknowledged that even 1% of GDP was ‘not a trivial amount’. […]
Saturday, June 28th, 2008
Cost of Tackling Global Climate Change Has Doubled
Author: JULIETTE JOWIT and PATRICK WINTOUR
Source: The Guardian (U.K.)
Publication Date: Thursday June 26, 2008
Link: Cost of Tackling Global Climate Change Has Doubled
Source: The Guardian (U.K.)
Publication Date: Thursday June 26, 2008
Link: Cost of Tackling Global Climate Change Has Doubled
Stephan: Although this is focused on the U.K. the same will be true here. Citizens are going to be punished twice. Once, because of what climate change is going to do to their lives. And a second time having to pay twice or more (probably much more) over what it would originally have cost to deal with these problems.
Thanks to Sam Crespi.