By voting down the proposed $700 billion financial bailout package – and causing a spectacular stock market rout – a majority of members in the House of Representatives made a clear statement that they didn’t want to put taxpayers on the hook for the failures of financial institutions. But there’s a catch: taxpayers are already on the hook for the failures of financial institutions, and it’s possible that the bill will actually be larger without bailout legislation than with it. That’s because the regulators who mind the financial industry – the Federal Reserve, Treasury and FDIC – will keep doing what they’ve been doing: stepping in to prevent the chaotic failure of banks and other large financial institutions. This means continuing to put hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars at risk, but in a way that adheres to no clear plan of action and doesn’t require members of Congress to explicitly approve their actions. On Monday afternoon, Wall Street basically stopped trading to watch TV – mainly CNBC – to see how the House of Representatives would vote on the $700 billion bailout package. When it first started looking like the bill would fail, the Dow plummeted 389 […]
Tuesday, September 30th, 2008
Without a Bailout Plan, What Will the Cost Be?
Author: JUSTIN FOX
Source: TIME
Publication Date: Monday, Sep. 29, 2008
Link: Without a Bailout Plan, What Will the Cost Be?
Source: TIME
Publication Date: Monday, Sep. 29, 2008
Link: Without a Bailout Plan, What Will the Cost Be?
Stephan: This piece captures the reality: bailout or no bailout we are going to pay. Do we want a controlled fire, or a wildfire? The market lost $1.5 trillion yesterday, twice the bill. I know this is terribly unpopular but I believe the compromise bill was a lost opportunity. When the Congress returns hopefully they will move. Once credit contractions start they gather momentum, and have dire consequences.