Universal Phone Charger Approved

Stephan:  Like many of you, I expect, I have a cardboard box full of chargers of one kind or another, each unique to its gadget. Most of the gadgets are long gone, but I hang on to the chargers in hopes they may have some other use. It is an absurd system, which this will at least partially correct.

A new mobile phone charger that will work with any handset has been approved by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a United Nations body. Industry body the GSMA says that 51,000 tonnes of redundant chargers are generated each year. Currently most chargers are product or brand specific, so people tend to change them when they upgrade to a new phone. However, the new energy-efficient chargers can be kept for much longer. The GSMA also estimates that they will reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions by 13.6m tonnes. ‘This is a significant step in reducing the environmental impact of mobile charging,’ said Malcolm Johnson, director of ITU’s Telecommunication Standardisation Bureau. ‘Universal chargers are a common-sense solution that I look forward to seeing in other areas.’ The charger has a micro-USB port at the connecting end, using similar technology to digital cameras. It is not compulsory for manufacturers to adopt the new chargers but the ITU says that some have already signed up to it. ‘We are planning to launch the universal charger internationally during the first half of 2010,’ Aldo Liguori, spokesperson for Sony Ericsson told the BBC. ‘We will roll it […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Fewer Americans See Solid Evidence of Global Warming

Stephan:  I keep saying that the most important political fact in America today is that 55 per cent of the American population believes the world was created within the last 10,000 years, with all its lifeforms pretty much as they are today. This miasma of willful ignorance finds a counterpart in the climate deniers. It will take a massive disaster to change this thinking, I am afraid, and even that may not be enough because a percentage of the population will just see it as the end times they so devoutly pray for -- completely enthralled, as they are, to the conceit that they are the only ones chosen to survive, and everyone else will be punished.

There has been a sharp decline over the past year in the percentage of Americans who say there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising. And fewer also see global warming as a very serious problem – 35% say that today, down from 44% in April 2008. The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Sept. 30-Oct. 4 among 1,500 adults reached on cell phones and landlines, finds that 57% think there is solid evidence that the average temperature on earth has been getting warmer over the past few decades. In April 2008, 71% said there was solid evidence of rising global temperatures. Over the same period, there has been a comparable decline in the proportion of Americans who say global temperatures are rising as a result of human activity, such as burning fossil fuels. Just 36% say that currently, down from 47% last year. The decline in the belief in solid evidence of global warming has come across the political spectrum, but has been particularly pronounced among independents. Just 53% of independents now see solid evidence of global warming, compared with 75% who did so in April […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Obama: Winner of The Clean-energy Race Will Lead Global Economy

Stephan:  This seems to be my day for confirmation by other sources. This is so self-evidently obvious it has always amazed me that anyone would disagree -- but, of course, they do by the conservative legion because they see it as in opposition to their short-term greed. Although I wholeheartedly support the control of carbon emissions, politically I believe that emphasizing The Green Transition, which will accomplish this carbon limitation, without directly saying so, is the leverage point to focus on. The fact that these same conservative corporate interests, outsourced our national ability to make the light bulbs and other technologies that will be used, so that Americans will not initially benefit from the jobs to create the mechanisms of the transition is another tragic unintended consequence of profit-as-the-only-priority thinking. When you hear a corporate executive talk about his concern about raising consumer costs when you look closer it will almost always really be about possibly reducing the corporation's profits.

WASHINGTON — Over the next three years, Americans will be required to replace nearly all their traditional light bulbs with cooler, more energy-efficient bulbs under a 2007 bill signed by President Bush. But almost all of the 100 production lines needed to churn out new bulbs are expected to be built overseas. Similar scenarios are likely to play out for wind turbines, solar cells and other key elements in the emerging global market for clean energy. That’s the gloomy prospect faced by federal officials and business leaders alike as they confront the twin challenges of combating climate change and trying to keep the U.S. competitive in the multi-trillion dollar race to develop and sell new energy systems. President Obama stressed the opportunities — and acknowledged the challenges — in a speech at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston today. ‘From China to India, from Japan to Germany, nations everywhere are racing to develop new ways to producing and use energy,’ he said. ‘The nation that wins this competition will be the nation that leads the global economy. I am convinced of that. And I want America to be that nation.’ Energy Secretary Steven Chu […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Junk Food Turns Rats Into Addicts

Stephan:  Remember the story of the chickens who refused to eat genetically modified corn? This is another report along the same lines. The obvious observation is that this is further proof that junk food is a disaster for human health. Consider this: 'To see how strong the drive to eat junk food was, the researchers exposed the rats to a foot shock when they ate the high-fat food. Rats that had not been constantly exposed to the junk food quickly stopped eating. But the foot shock didn't faze rats accustomed to the junk food - they continued to eat, even though they knew the shock was coming.' But bad as that is I think there is a more fundamental and alarming trend here. Both the chicken story and this one, are further examples of the results of America's decision to make greed and profit the only social priorities -- the core values of our society. We are destroying ourselves as surely as the Easter Islanders cut down the trees upon which their environment and society depended. Thanks to Judy Tart.

CHICAGO — Junk food elicits addictive behavior in rats similar to the behaviors of rats addicted to heroin, a new study finds. Pleasure centers in the brains of rats addicted to high-fat, high-calorie diets became less responsive as the binging wore on, making the rats consume more and more food. The results, presented October 20 at the Society for Neuroscience’s annual meeting, may help explain the changes in the brain that lead people to overeat. ‘This is the most complete evidence to date that suggests obesity and drug addiction have common neurobiological underpinnings,’ says study coauthor Paul Johnson of the Scripps Research Institute in Jupiter, Fla. To see how junk food affects the brain’s natural reward system – the network of nerve cells that release feel-good chemicals – Johnson started at the grocery store. He loaded up on typical Western fare, including Ho Hos, sausage, pound cake, bacon and cheesecake. Johnson fed rats either a standard diet of high-nutrient, low-calorie chow, or unlimited amounts of the palatable junk food. Rats that ate the junk food soon developed compulsive eating habits and became obese. ‘They’re taking in twice the amount of calories as the control rats,’ says Johnson’s coauthor […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Soros Calls Wall St Profits ‘Gifts’ From State

Stephan:  I have been saying this for over a year, but here is a major financial figure saying the same.

The big profits made by some of Wall Street’s leading banks are ‘hidden gifts’ from the state, and taxpayer resentment of such companies is ‘justified,’ George Soros, the fund manager, said in an interview with the Financial Times. ‘Those earnings are not the achievement of risk-takers,’ Mr Soros said. ‘These are gifts, hidden gifts, from the government, so I don’t think that those monies should be used to pay bonuses. There’s a resentment which I think is justified.’ Mr Soros, who joins a transatlantic chorus calling for limits on risk, leverage and compensation at big banks, said proprietary traders belong at hedge funds, not at banks, and that the compensation at Wall Street companies should be limited to prevent excessive risk. ‘With the too-big-to-fail concept comes a need to regulate the payments that employees receive,’ said Mr Soros, who will elaborate on his views in lectures in Budapest next week. Some bankers have argued that limits on pay would make it difficult for them to retain their most talented risk-takers. Mr Soros agreed and said this would be a good thing. ‘That would push the risk-takers who are good at taking risks out of Goldman […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments