WASHINGTON — President Obama on Tuesday stepped into the middle of a fierce lobbying battle by reinforcing his support for an independent agency to protect consumers against lending abuses that contributed to the financial crisis. The president’s move also signaled a tougher line and a more direct role as Congress weighs an overhaul of banking regulation. The financial industry and Congressional Republicans have singled out the administration’s proposed consumer agency in particular, hoping to greatly weaken if not kill it. With liberal Democrats and Web commentators fighting just as hard for a strong independent office, the issue is becoming the central flashpoint in the debate over regulation. Mr. Obama personally weighed in on Tuesday in a one-on-one meeting at the White House with Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. Reports last week suggested that Mr. Dodd might drop the consumer agency from the emerging Senate bill in order to attract support from Republicans and some centrist Democrats on his committee, but Democratic aides disputed that. Some Democrats in Congress and the administration describe a possible fallback position that would give enhanced consumer protection powers to existing federal regulators, perhaps […]
Thursday, January 21st, 2010
Obama Pressing for Protections Against Lenders
Author: JACKIE CALMES and SEWELL CHAN
Source: The New York Times
Publication Date: 20-Jan-10
Link: Obama Pressing for Protections Against Lenders
Source: The New York Times
Publication Date: 20-Jan-10
Link: Obama Pressing for Protections Against Lenders
Stephan: Here is an example of what I mean about the fall-out from the Massachusetts election. If lending protections get thrown overboard, like the public option, we should take that as a clear sign 2010 is likely to be a painful and difficult year.
Maybe I am just depressed by all this tonight. Maybe it is because I drove up the main highway between Phoenix and Sedona to see my brother in the hospital (yet again) and for long stretches did not have cell coverage -- there is not a single comparable main road anywhere in Europe where such electronic lacunae exist -- or maybe it is my day long struggle with the healthcare system to do the obvious and needful. Whatever the reason I see all of this as self-inflicted, and a sign of worse to come. I think we, in America, are all going to have to focus on the local if we want any quality of life to survive. I don't see it coming from the Federal government. It will be a very different country, and I do not see that as a good thing, merely a strategy to preserve what little we can.