Nigel Inkster, the former assistant head of the British spy service MI6, slammed the United States’ handling of its fight on terror, including what he called the ‘frenzied, alarmist response’ to the recently foiled Christmas Day bomber. Writing in an article published in the International Institute for Strategic Studies journal Survival, Inkster and coauthor Alexander Nicoll hammered what they believe is an out of proportion response to attempted terror attacks. They also attacked the United States’ policy of imprisoning detainees without trial — a practice that has continued under President Barack Obama. ‘It is surely not inspiring for radicalised people with the potential for violent action to see terrorists tried in ordinary criminal courts and sentenced to long prison terms.’ The authors, both members of the International Institute, continue: ‘But it surely is inspiring to them to see terrorists treated as a special class of prisoners to be held by the military, imprisoned without trial and tortured. This is the kind of treatment that makes jihadists believe that they can indeed be the fighters for a cause that they aspire to be.’ Obama has largely turned from a policy under President George W. Bush where alleged terrorists […]
Wednesday, April 28th, 2010
Ex-MI6 Boss Slams United States For Abandoning Democratic Principles In Terror Fight
Author: JOHN BYRNE
Source: The Raw Story
Publication Date: Tuesday, April 27th, 2010 -- 9:05 am
Link: Ex-MI6 Boss Slams United States For Abandoning Democratic Principles In Terror Fight
Source: The Raw Story
Publication Date: Tuesday, April 27th, 2010 -- 9:05 am
Link: Ex-MI6 Boss Slams United States For Abandoning Democratic Principles In Terror Fight
Stephan: As a veteran and as one of the small team of people that changed the military from an elitist conscription organization to an all-volunteer meritocracy, I have a special fury for those who misuse the young men and women who CHOOSE to become part of America's armed services.
An accurate history of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, why we got into them, who was responsible, and what the grounds for such policies were, is becoming clearer and clearer. It is a shameful story, and we ought to be outraged over how the patriotism of these self-selected young men and women, was manipulated and abused. That these failures even extend to rehabilitation and treatment of those volunteers is unspeakable. And what are we to make of the public silence over the shabby treatment extended to these sons and daughters?