Aspirin May Cut Colon Cancer Deaths

Stephan:  The Rothwell study appears in the Oct. 22 early online edition of The Lancet.

Long-term use of low-dose aspirin reduces colon cancer risk, U.K. researchers find.

Low-dose aspirin takers have a 24% lower risk of colon cancer and a 35% lower risk of dying from colon cancer, find University of Oxford researcher Peter Rothwell and colleagues.

‘The new findings on the effect of low-dose aspirin should be included in advice given to the public,’ Rothwell says in a news release.

The findings are based on analysis of 20-year follow-up data from five clinical trials. All of the studies were performed before sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy became widespread methods of screening for colon cancer. It’s not clear whether better screening reduces the benefit seen for aspirin.

And aspirin can have serious side effects, including severe stomach bleeding. While low doses of aspirin reduce this risk, people should consult a health care provider before adding aspirin to their daily health regimen.

However, the findings suggest that aspirin has a particular effect on more aggressive and faster growing colon cancers, particularly those in the proximal colon, which can be detected by colonoscopy but not by sigmoidoscopy.

This makes the study findings significant, says Alison Ross, senior science information officer at Cancer Research U.K.

‘This is the first large study to show that low doses […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

It’s the Occupation, Stupid

Stephan:  Finally, some truth is emerging about the insanity of the Iraq war, and the effect the callous manipulation of American fear has actually had on our society.

Although no one wants to talk about it, 9/11 is still hurting America. That terrible day inflicted a wound of public fear that easily reopens with the smallest provocation, and it continues to bleed the United States of money, lives, and goodwill around the world. Indeed, America’s response to its fear has, in turn, made Americans less safe and has inspired more threats and attacks.

In the decade since 9/11, the United States has conquered and occupied two large Muslim countries (Afghanistan and Iraq), compelled a huge Muslim army to root out a terrorist sanctuary (Pakistan), deployed thousands of Special Forces troops to numerous Muslim countries (Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, etc.), imprisoned hundreds of Muslims without recourse, and waged a massive war of ideas involving Muslim clerics to denounce violence and new institutions to bring Western norms to Muslim countries. Yet Americans still seem strangely mystified as to why some Muslims might be angry about this situation.

In a narrow sense, America is safer today than on 9/11. There has not been another attack on the same scale. U.S. defenses regarding immigration controls, airport security, and the disruption of potentially devastating domestic plots have all improved.

But in a broader sense, America has become […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Congressional Hopefuls Avoid Media, Events at 11th Hour of Elections

Stephan:  The strategy being pursued by the Teabagger candidates, arguably the least qualified and most ethically compromised slate of candidates in living memory, has been to not talk to the press. They only appear on Fox New's agitprop propaganda channel. This is a new and very dangerous trend, and I am amazed that more has not been made of it. It is impossible for ordinary voters to dig out and pursue lies, contradictions, and frauds perpetrated by candidates. If candidates don't talk to the press, don't answer questions about their backgrounds and positions, how can voters know enough to make an informed choice? Put another way: how can a democracy properly function? And while I am on the subject, let me explain why I believe Fox News is qualitatively different from the other cable networks. Certainly MSNBC has a liberal orientation, and CNN tries to be neutral although, because of Anderson Cooper, it has a bias for the life-affirming (which some think of as liberal, which is an interesting comment in itself). But none of the other cable channels routinely coordinate with a single party, nor do they donate large sums of money to a single party; nor does any other news network have senior executives actively involved in SuperPacs that are quite blatantly trying to buy the U.S. government; nor does any other network have actual potential presidential candidates as news commentators. Every single currently credible Republican candidate, who is not presently in a public office, with the exception of Mitt Romney, is on the payroll of Fox. Any one of these things is unprecedented in our history; collectively this represents a direct assault on the role of the press in a free society. To understand Fox News, one would have to go back to the Soviet Union, and its control of media, to find a parallel model.

Campaigning has evolved from the days when a candidate had to directly interact with voters to win over their support. While most still show up at diners and grasp hands at community events, it is seen more as evidence of the candidates’ hard work and connection to the people rather than a way to win over individual votes.

Today, receptive voters can be reached using detailed databases and kept in the loop with targeted e-mails and personalized messages via Facebook. Voters who want to hear from candidates can look at YouTube channels and sign up for Twitter feeds.

At the same time, technology has added to the perils of public events.

‘Almost everybody has a video camera inside their telephone, so pictures and video are rolling at a moment’s notice and can be on YouTube in an hour,’ said former Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (R-N.Y.). ‘That has brought advice from campaign handlers and consultants to tighten up how and what you’re saying, and who you’re saying it to.’

Even then, candidates can get in trouble. Angle has come under criticism this week after video from a closed event revealed her telling a room of Hispanic students that ‘some of you look a little more […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Do All These Expensive Campaign Ads Matter?

Stephan:  Please click through and look at how much money is being spent on key races that comes from sources outside of the state in question. These are some of the tracks showing how the American government is being purchased.

MESQUITE, Nev. - Candidates and outside interest groups are expected to spend at least $50 million in Nevada’s 2010 federal election campaigns, mostly on advertising, but it’s unclear how much that will influence the state’s voters - if at all.

The targets of this spending spree, like those in other close races around the country, are the people who play golf at the Falcon Ridge Golf Club in this town of 25,000 northeast of Las Vegas. Or the folks who shop at the nearby Wal-Mart or hang out at the Stateline Casino, where many of the regulars are unemployed or retirees living on fixed incomes.

These Nevada voters will have a big say in the outcome of two of the nation’s most closely watched races: The U.S. Senate contest between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican Sharron Angle - polls show a dead heat - and the U.S. House of Representatives race for Nevada’s 3rd Congressional District between Democratic incumbent Dina Titus and Republican Joe Heck.

Campaign ads help candidates influence voters, just as any advertising affects a consumer’s view of a product, whether it’s soap or cereal. Ads can boost a little-known product’s visibility, and cement a product image in the […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Griftopia – America on Sale

Stephan: 

Matt Taibbi’s unsparing and authoritative reporting on the financial crisis has produced a series of memorable Rolling Stone features. He showed us how Goldman Sachs, that ‘great vampire squid’, played a central role in creating not only the housing bubble but four other big speculative booms that filled its coffers while wrecking the American economy. He explained how Wall Street banks cooked up schemes that helped decimate municipal budgets and cost countless jobs, and how Wall Street lobbying led to a financial reform bill that won’t prevent another meltdown. Taibbi builds on that eye-opening work in his new book, Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That is Breaking America, due out from Spiegel & Grau on November 2. In this exclusive excerpt, he describes how our cash-strapped country is auctioning off its highways, ports and even parking meters at fire sale prices – and finding eager buyers in the unregulated sovereign wealth funds of oil-rich Middle Eastern countries.

Editors – Rolling Stone

———-

In the summer of 2009 I got a call from an acquaintance who worked in the Middle East. He was a young American who worked for something called a sovereign wealth fund, a giant state-owned pile […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments