Why Do Meteorologists Dismiss Climate Change Science?

Stephan:  One of the peculiarities of the climate change argument has been the general denierism on the part of the TV meteorologist community. Very little has been written about this oddity -- since 96% plus of climate scientists not only accept the reality of climate change, but are running banging alarms. This essay at least raises the relevant issues.

John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel and the original weatherman on Good Morning America: ‘There isn’t any climate crisis,’ he said. ‘It’s totally manufactured.’

Meteorologists are notoriously reluctant to accept climate change. Why so? Theirs is a profession that studies the weather, which is akin to what climate scientists do by studying the weather over relatively long periods. Of course, they are not as educated as climate scientists who have PhD’s in their field, while many meteorologists have college degrees unrelated to meteorology. Meteorologists know the pitfalls of being wrong when making a forecast, however, they do not seem to realize that the conclusions of climate scientists are not the same as saying there is a 50% chance of precipitation tomorrow. The International Panel on Climate Change or IPCC put a probability that it is more than 90% likely that man is causing climate change. Do meteorologists, weathermen to use a more prosaic term, just feel inferior to climate scientists or just why are they so dismissive about climate change?

According to a 2010 survey…

Twenty-nine percent of the 121 meteorologists who replied agreed …–not that global warming was unproven, or unlikely, but that it was a […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Most Red States Take More Money From Washington Than They Put In

Stephan:  This trend is finally beginning to get some traction. The Red State 'small' government Theocratic Rightists are utter hypocrites -- or maybe just ignorant. Their social values, which they prat about endlessly -- look at the contraceptive debate -- produce inferior social outcomes, require much greater government involvement, and cost more. Their whole social values argument is specious. I urge you to click through and look at the maps you will find on the primary site.

It’s no secret: The federal budget is expanding faster than tax revenues, a trend that’s been fueled by the rapid growth of entitlement programs and exacerbated by the recession. As a recent New York Times article documents, even as fiscally conservative lawmakers complain about deficit spending, their constituents don’t want to give up the Social Security checks, Medicare benefits, and earned income tax credits that provide a safety net for the struggling middle class.

This gap between political perception and fiscal reality is also reflected in the distribution of tax dollars at the state level: Most politically ‘red’ states are financially in the red when it comes to how much money they receive from Washington compared with what their residents pay in taxes.

A look at 2010 Census and IRS data reveals that the 50 states and the District of Columbia, on average, received $1.29 in federal spending for every federal tax dollar they paid. That means that some states are getting a lot more than they put in, and vice versa. The states that contributed more in taxes than they got back in spending were more likely to have voted for Obama in 2008 and were more likely to be largely […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

The Swiss Government’s Remarkable Report on Homeopathic Medicine

Stephan:  SR reader Dana Ullman has an excellent piece on an important development concerning Homeopathy. Dana has been promoting an evidence based assessment of homeopathy since I met him back in the 1970s, and his views are data-based and solid. For those who use this medical system, as I have to good effect, this Swiss report is worth your attention.

The Swiss government has a long and widely-respected history of neutrality, and therefore, reports from this government on controversial subjects need to be taken more seriously than other reports from countries that are more strongly influenced by present economic and political constituencies. When one considers that two of the top five largest drug companies in the world have their headquarters in Switzerland, one might assume that this country would have a heavy interest in and bias toward conventional medicine, but such assumptions would be wrong.

In late 2011, the Swiss government’s report on homeopathic medicine represents the most comprehensive evaluation of homeopathic medicine ever written by a government and was just published in book form in English (Bornhoft and Matthiessen, 2011). This breakthrough report affirmed that homeopathic treatment is both effective and cost-effective and that homeopathic treatment should be reimbursed by Switzerland’s national health insurance program.

The Swiss government’s inquiry into homeopathy and complementary and alternative (CAM) treatments resulted from the high demand and widespread use of alternatives to conventional medicine in Switzerland, not only from consumers but from physicians as well. Approximately half of the Swiss population have used CAM treatments and value them. Further, about half of Swiss physicians consider […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Scientists Did Not Break Speed of Light – it Was a Faulty Wire

Stephan:  Last September I ran the first report concerning this research, when the claim of faster than light was announced. This is the correction, and a shining example of science doing what it should do: constantly course correct to account for better data. Let me note also that this is why I keep saying 'if' the Rossi LENR technology proves itself.

It was Albert Einstein who proposed more than 100 years ago that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light.

Einstein’s theory of special relativity, proposed in 1905, states that nothing in the universe can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.

But researchers at the CERN lab near Geneva claimed they had recorded neutrinos, a type of tiny particle, travelling faster than the barrier of 186,282 miles (299,792 kilometers) per second.

Now it seems Einstein’s reputation has been restored after a source close to the experiment told the US journal Science Insider that ‘A bad connection between a GPS unit and a computer may be to blame.’

______________
CERN scientists ‘break the speed of light’
22 Sep 2011

Speed of light broken again as scientists test neutrino result
19 Nov 2011

Speed-of-light experiment ‘was wrong after all’
21 Nov 2011

______________

Scientists at CERN claimed that neutrinos arrived 60 nanoseconds earlier than the 2.3 milliseconds taken by light.

The report in Science Insider said the ’60 nanoseconds discrepancy appears to come from a bad connection between a fiber optic cable […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments