Over the last several days, the mainstream media has fallen for an elaborate scientific hoax that sought to destroy the credibility of organic foods by claiming they are ‘no healthier
Wednesday, September 12th, 2012
Busted: Co-Author of Flawed Stanford Organic Study Has Deep Ties to Big Tobacco’s Anti-Science Propaganda
Author: MIKE ADAMS and ANTHONY GUCCIARDI
Source: Natural Society
Publication Date: 7-Sep-12
Link: Busted: Co-Author of Flawed Stanford Organic Study Has Deep Ties to Big Tobacco’s Anti-Science Propaganda
Source: Natural Society
Publication Date: 7-Sep-12
Link: Busted: Co-Author of Flawed Stanford Organic Study Has Deep Ties to Big Tobacco’s Anti-Science Propaganda
Stephan: Recently you probably saw a lot of stories about how organic food was no more nutritious than food raised with chemicals. I did not run it because I thought there was something bogus about it. For one thing organic food is better for you simply because it doesn't have any chemical residue. Now, as often happens, a different truth is emerging. I consider the report you are about to read unduly polemic, and it only provisionally makes its case. I have chosen to run it because I think the study it criticizes may be another example of the corrupting influence that is occurring in science. I have run other pieces, indeed, wrote an essay about the toxic consequences of the pharmaceutical industry embracing medicine. If this report is correct, the study will be a demonstration of the same disinformation techniques that we can see at work in climate change denierism, tobacco propaganda, and creationism.