Child Obesity Rates Drop 43% in Past Decade

Stephan:  Here -- potentially -- is some good news about obesity in little children: it seems to be significantly on decline. It is not evenly spread through the country, Red value states still have more obese children proportionally than Blue value states but, overall, things are looking better, although not in older children. I think a lot of this is due to the publicity created by Michelle Obama that mothers have listened to and integrated.. But it is going to take studies that replicate this effect to be sure it is for real.

With so little good news about obesity in the USA, public health advocates are celebrating a rare victory: a sharp decline in obesity rates among young children.

The problem of childhood obesity has gotten a national platform in recent years, through first lady Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” campaign. Obama has even appeared with Elmo and Big Bird on Sesame Street to talk about nutrition and exercise.

Today, with the release of new obesity numbers, Obama suggests that her preschool audience has taken her advice to heart.

While obesity rates for most Americans haven’t changed significantly over the past decade, among kids ages 2 to 5 the obesity rate dropped from 14% in 2003-2004 to just over 8% in 2011-2012, according to a report out Tuesday from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That represents a drop of 43%, CDC said.

“I am thrilled at the progress we’ve made over the last few years in obesity rates among our youngest Americans,” Obama said in a statement. “Healthier habits are beginning to become the new norm.”

STORY: CDC: Childhood obesity rates falling in many states

Also on Tuesday, Obama announced new rules to ban the marketing of unhealthy foods in schools during the school day. “Our classrooms […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Silencing the Scientist: Tyrone Hayes on Being Targeted by Herbicide Firm Syngenta

Stephan:  This is what the virtual corporate states routinely try to do to scientists. All the sectors of science where billions of dollars are at risk are subject to this pressure. (See The Great Experiment: Genetically Modified Organisms, Scientific Integrity, and National Wellness. http://www.explorejournal.com/article/S1550-8307%2812%2900222-4/fulltext.) It is severely distorting American science.

We speak with scientist Tyrone Hayes of the University of California, Berkeley, who discovered a widely used herbicide may have harmful effects on the endocrine system. But when he tried to publish the results, the chemical’s manufacturer launched a campaign to discredit his work. Hayes was first hired in 1997 by a company, which later became agribusiness giant Syngenta, to study their product, atrazine, a pesticide that is applied to more than half the corn crops in the United States, and widely used on golf courses and Christmas tree farms. When Hayes found results Syngenta did not expect – that atrazine causes sexual abnormalities in frogs, and could cause the same problems for humans – it refused to allow him to publish his findings. A new article in The New Yorker magazine uses court documents from a class action lawsuit against Syngenta to show how it sought to smear Hayes’ reputation and prevent the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from banning the profitable chemical, which is already banned by the European Union.

TRANSCRIPT:

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Now we turn to the story of a University of California scientist who discovered that a […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Dad May Join Two Moms for Disease-Free Designer Babies

Stephan:  This is an excellent assessment concerning the latest in the Homo Superior Trend. The essay raises all the right issues. This is going to be a major and fundamental change. I first started writing about genetic engineering and its implications in 2006, and have been struck by the steady progress this branch of scientific medicine has made in the years since. Paper after paper keeps coming out in the peer-reviewed literature. (See Homo Superiorus www.explore journal.com/content/schwartz. These are possibly our children but our grandchildren certainly. And the trend is going to be augmented by another trend familiar to SR readers: antibiotic medicine is declining as a result of overuse in industrial animal husbandry. Genetic engineering can obviate the problem. Or eliminating a chronic disease; a slight adjustment will eventually make cardio-vascular disease unlikely. But there are profound ethical issues here: it risks creating a new species of humans, with all of the implications such a development would create, many very neagative.

A new technology aimed at eliminating genetic disease in newborns would combine the DNA of three people, instead of just two, to create a child, potentially redrawing ethical lines for designer babies.

The process works by replacing potentially variant DNA in the unfertilized eggs of a hopeful mother with disease-free genes from a donor. U.S. regulators today will begin weighing whether the procedure, used only in monkeys so far, is safe enough to be tested in humans.

Because the process would change only a small, specific part of genetic code, scientists say a baby would largely retain the physical characteristics of the parents. Still, DNA from all three — mother, father and donor — would remain with the child throughout a lifetime, opening questions about long-term effects for this generation, and potentially the next. Ethicists worry that allowing pre-birth gene manipulation may one day lead to build-to-order designer babies.

‘Once you make this change, if a female arises from the process and goes on to have children, that change is passed on, so it’s forever,” Phil Yeske, chief science officer of the United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation, said by telephone. ‘That’s uncharted territory; we just don’t know what it means. Permanent change of the […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Brazil, Europe Plan Undersea Cable to Skirt U.S. Spying

Stephan:  Another unintended consequence of the rise of the American surveillance state. Think about it. Brazil and Europe are going to build and maintain, at a cost of nearly two hundred million dollars just to start a parallel net, because they want to avoid American snooping. What does that tell us about how our country is viewed? This is why American travelers report greater Anti-Americanism. I lived in Egypt for a little over two years - 1979-1981, spending most days walking in the streets with a remote viewer, along with two cameras, a still photographer, a sound person, a document editor, and a production assistant. Failrly high profile. This was The Alexandria Project. I wouldn't consider such a thing today.

BRUSSELS — Brazil and the European Union agreed on Monday to lay an undersea communications cable from Lisbon to Fortaleza to reduce Brazil’s reliance on the United States after Washington spied on Brasilia.

At a summit in Brussels, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff said the $185 million cable project was central to “guarantee the neutrality” of the Internet, signaling her desire to shield Brazil’s Internet traffic from U.S. surveillance.

“We have to respect privacy, human rights and the sovereignty of nations. We don’t want businesses to be spied upon,” Rousseff told a joint news conference with the presidents of the European Commission and the European Council.

“The Internet is one of the best things man has ever invented. So we agreed for the need to guarantee … the neutrality of the network, a democratic area where we can protect freedom of expression,” Rousseff said.

Rousseff postponed a state visit to Washington last year in protest at the U.S. National Security Agency spying on her email and phone and is now seeking alternative routes to U.S. cables.

Brazil relies on U.S. undersea cables to carry almost all of its communications to Europe. The existing cable between Europe and Brazil is outdated and only used for voice transmission.

EU […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Pew Report: City’s Middle Class is Shrinking

Stephan:  Here is some actual data on what is happening to the urban middle class in one of America's great cities. It is mirrored in New York, Detroit and many smaller cities.

The Philadelphia middle class, a backbone of economic vitality that once made up the majority of residents in most of the city’s neighborhoods, has declined in steep numbers since 1970, from 59 percent to 42 percent by 2010, according to a report released Monday, the first of its kind.

The precipitous decline of adults within this long-celebrated class occurred widely across the city and most sharply before 2000, sparing only chunks of Far Northeast Philadelphia and Roxborough and smaller pockets elsewhere. Those areas remained majority middle-class as of a few years ago, said the Pew Charitable Trusts, which spearheaded the study.

The data capture what has been sensed and dreaded by policymakers for years: Philadelphia is decidedly poorer than when it was a manufacturing powerhouse, losing even a greater share of higher-taxpaying middle-class residents than the nation as a whole, and failing even to see increases in its upper-class population to match other cities that fared better.

Whether middle-class Philadelphians fell into a lower-income class, moved into the suburbs, or died is not shown by Pew’s analysis, as researchers have found such detailed tracking to be elusive.

Marriage an overlooked component to income inequality
But the share of lower-class Philadelphians spiked from 30 percent […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments