Robert Reich on the Billionaires Who Are Warping Our Political System

Stephan:  Here is an excellent and well-grounded assessment of why we are, thanks to Citizens United and other trends, transiting from a democracy to an oligarchical state.

Charles and David Koch should not be blamed for having more wealth than the bottom 40 percent of Americans put together. Nor should they be condemned for their petrochemical empire. As far as I know, they’ve played by the rules and obeyed the laws.

They’re also entitled to their own right-wing political views. It’s a free country.

But in using their vast wealth to change those rules and laws in order to fit their political views, the Koch brothers are undermining our democracy. That’s a betrayal of the most precious thing Americans share.

The Kochs exemplify a new reality that strikes at the heart of America. The vast wealth that has accumulated at the top of the American economy is not itself the problem. The problem is that political power tends to rise to where the money is. And this combination of great wealth with political power leads to greater and greater accumulations and concentrations of both – tilting the playing field in favor of the Kochs and their ilk, and against the rest of us.

America is not yet an oligarchy, but that’s where the Koch’s and a few other billionaires are taking us.

American democracy used to depend […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

10,853 Out of 10,855 Scientists Agree: Global Warming Is Happening, and Humans Are to Blame

Stephan:  Let's get real about where science and climate change stand. Here is some actual data. Click through to see the very revealing graphic.

As geochemist James Lawrence Powell continues to prove, the only people still debating whether or not climate change is ‘real,” and caused by human activity, are the ones who aren’t doing the actual research. In an update to his ongoing project of reviewing the literature on global warming, Powell went through every scientific study published in a peer-review journal during the calendar year 2013, finding 10,855 in total (more on his methodology here). Of those, a mere two rejected anthropogenic global warming. The consensus, as he defines it, looks like this:

Powell even had to expand that itty bitty slice of the consensus pie five times for us to make it out – the actual doubt about climate change within the scientific community is even tinier.

Adding this new data to his previous findings, Powell estimates that the going rate for climate denial in scientific research is about 1 in 1,000. The outliers, he adds, ‘have had no discernible influence on science.” From this, he comes up with a theory of his own:
advertisement

Very few of the most vocal global warming deniers, those who write op-eds and blogs and testify to congressional committees, have ever written a […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

NJ Bank Won’t Notarize American Atheist Documents for “Personal Reasons’

Stephan:  As you consider Hobby Lobby, here is where it goes. Is this the country you want to live in?

The managing director of American Atheists, Inc. reported on Tuesday that she was refused notary service at a TD bank in Cranford, NJ because of her atheist affiliation.

In a post on Facebook, Amanda Knief wrote, ‘I was just refused service – because I am an atheist. It was embarrassing, humiliating, and it pissed me off.”

According to Knief, she and American Atheists president David Silverman were in the process of getting documents notarized by one of the bank’s notaries public when the woman asked them what the documents were for.

‘The documents were charitable organizations registrations for American Atheists in several states,” wrote Knief. ‘So I told her what AA is about. She looked down, then looked at me and Dave Silverman and said she couldn’t sign the documents because of “personal reasons’ and went to find another notary who was eating his lunch to come do the authentications.”

‘I have been called names, threatened, hated on and all manner of ridiculed because of my atheist activism, but I think sitting in a bank and having another professional refuse to do business with me because I am an atheist was the worst slight I have ever received,” she continued. ‘This is completely unacceptable, […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

U.S. Seniors Have Realigned With the Republican Party

Stephan:  In this century for the first time in American history, going back to Jamestown, and over the planet at large, Whites will no longer dominate the world. This is producing, in a fraction or the aging white population, an intense level of anxiety. In this Gallup survey it is easy to see the aging white minority.

PRINCETON, NJ — U.S seniors — those aged 65 and older — have moved from a reliably Democratic group to a reliably Republican one over the past two decades. From 1992 through 2006, seniors had been solidly Democratic and significantly more Democratic than younger Americans. Over the last seven years, seniors have become less Democratic, and have shown an outright preference for the Republican Party since 2010.

Democratic Advantage in Party Affiliation, by Age, 1992-2013

In 1992, 53% of senior citizens, on average, identified as Democrats or said they were independents but leaned Democratic, while 39% identified as Republicans or leaned Republican, resulting in a 14-percentage-point Democratic advantage in seniors’ party affiliation. Last year, 48% of seniors identified as or leaned Republican, and 45% Democratic, a three-point Republican advantage. The full 1992-2013 party affiliation trends for seniors and younger Americans are shown on page 2.

By comparison, younger Americans, those aged 18 to 64, shifted from +1 point Democratic in 1992 to +8 Democratic in 2013, and tended to show greater Democratic advantages from 2006 to 2013 than prior to that. The changes in younger Americans’ party affiliation generally follow those among the broader U.S. adult population between 1992 and 2013.

Senior citizens’ changing […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

More Evidence That Half of America Is In or Near Poverty

Stephan:  Inequity that is perceived as unreasonable leads to social instability. We are very close to approaching that point. Perhaps because I grew up and was involved in the civil rights and anti-war movements I don't understand why we are not having mass demonstrations. The visceral quality of hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating every day in Washington makes a big impact.

The Charles Koch Foundation recently released a commercial that ranked a near-poverty-level $34,000 family among the Top 1 percent of poor people in the world. Bud Konheim, CEO and co-founder of fashion company Nicole Miller, concurred: “The guy that’s making, oh my God, he’s making $35,000 a year, why don’t we try that out in India or some countries we can’t even name. China, anyplace, the guy is wealthy.”

Comments like these are condescending and self-righteous. They display an ignorance of the needs of lower-income and middle-income families in America. The costs of food and housing and education and health care and transportation and child care and taxes have been well-defined by organizations such as the Economic Policy Institute, which calculated that a U.S. family of three would require an average of about $48,000 a year to meet basic needs; and by the Working Poor Families Project, which estimates the income required for basic needs for a family of four at about $45,000. The median household income is $51,000.

The following discussion pertains to the half of America that is in or near poverty, the people rarely seen by Congress.

1. The Official Poverty Threshold Should Be Much Higher

According to the Congressional Research […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments