Stephan:   This is the latest on what I confess I initially found a very odd story: A group of leading billionaires were putting $1 billion dollars into nuclear energy. And then I added up the Forbes wealth estimates for these people, and the corporations they control and realized that a collective billion dollars is actually a modest play which, should it work out, could return many multiples of the investment. And if not it would have no significant effect on any of them. Think about that. On the technical merits I think this will be seen as a bad call, a waste of money. The idea is to replace the reactors now operating in the U.S., which are past their close down date. There are 99 of them in operation today, and these deteriorating physical plants become more degraded and dangerous ever year. They are just old. Superficially that makes sense. But this new investment presumes a major breakthrough in nuclear power, which I think is problematic. And it still does nothing about the millions of pounds and gallons of radioactive waste, and that is going to become an increasingly hot topic. Imagine something like Fukushima in your area. I think they have also significantly misjudged the rapidity with which the carbon era is ending, and the cost level to which noncarbon, non-nuclear generation has dropped. It will be interesting to see how this new-nuclear trend works out.