What’s the Meaning of Failure? A Dictionary of Euphemisms for Imperial Decline

Stephan:  America has created an age of endless war; there will be people voting in this election who have never known the United States when it was not at war. It is very profitable and has been going on so long it is now the societal norm.  And as that has happened something very strange has happened to our language. Descriptions of the killing, murder, bombing, the deaths and maiming of tens of millions of people have been slathered like smearing makeup on a corpse with euphemisms.  Here is an excellent example of this immoral and shameful trend.
Credit: Sergio Vassio

Credit: Sergio Vassio

The dishonesty of words illustrates the dishonesty of America’s wars.

Since 9/11, can there be any doubt that the public has become numb to the euphemisms that regularly accompany US troops, drones, and CIA operatives into Washington’s imperial conflicts across the Greater Middle East and Africa? Such euphemisms are meant to take the sting out of America’s wars back home. Many of these words and phrases are already so well known and well worn that no one thinks twice about them anymore.

Here are just a few: collateral damage for killed and wounded civilians (a term used regularly since the First Gulf War of 1990-1991). Enhanced interrogation techniques for torture, a term adopted with vigor by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and the rest of their administration (“techniques” that were actually demonstrated in the White House). Extraordinary rendition for CIA kidnappings of terror suspects off global streets or from remote badlands, often followed by the employment of enhanced interrogation techniques at US […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Corporate tax dodging costing US billions in annual income

Stephan:  The United States has 47 million people in poverty, millions have hunger issues including children and the elderly. We have at the most charitable a tattered social safety net. And corporate tax dodging is costing us billions. The system has the wrong priorities and yet is totally legal and unspeakably corrupt.
Turks and Caicos Credit: thurksandcaicostourism

Turks and Caicos
Credit: thurksandcaicostourism

Big multinational companies that shelter overseas profit from federal taxation cost the U.S. economy more than $100 billion a year by withholding more than $1 trillion collectively, according to a new study that may inflame the debate over tax fairness.

This week, anti-poverty group Oxfam America published a report that analyzed the financial reports of the 50 largest publicly traded U.S. companies. The organization found that behemoths such as Apple, General Electric, Microsoft and Google engage in tax havens that costs the U.S. $111 billion annually. Apple was cited by Oxfam as one of the biggest corporate offenders, holding some $181 billion in money offshore, followed by GE’s $119 billion and Microsoft’s $108 billion.

The U.S’s effective corporate tax rate is 35 percent, but the study found that companies used a variety of tax strategies to cut that rate to just 26.5 percent—with only 5 of the 50 companies paying the full 35 percent.

The […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Afghanistan Has Cost the U.S. More Than the Marshall Plan

Stephan:  "The U.S. has now spent more on the reconstruction of Afghanistan than it spent on the Marshall Plan, which resuscitated Europe after World War II, according to a special inspector general." And the result: after decades of war Afghanistan is a failed state with almost no future prospects. I read this report and thought: if ever one wanted two examples one a successful foreign policy the other a total and abject failure this is the example. Like every empire before us there comes a time when the leading power just loses its way and its chops and squanders money and lives to no good effect for itself or anyone else. And this seems to be the state of the United States today.
Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan 15 years into America's endless war Credit: tripadvisor

Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan 15 years into America’s endless war
Credit: tripadvisor

The U.S. has now spent more on the reconstruction of Afghanistan than it spent on the Marshall Plan, which resuscitated Europe after World War II, according to a special inspector general. (emphasis added)

The Marshall Plan delivered $103 billion in today’s dollars to 16 European countries between 1948 and 1952. That has now been topped by congressional appropriations for reconstruction in Afghanistan, which so far have come to $109 billion in today’s dollars. The difference: The Marshall Plan helped Europe get back on its feet, while Afghanistan is a chaotic mess.

The Marshall Plan comparison is the most striking fact in a depressing, 259-page quarterly report (pdf) to Congress issued July 30 by John Sopko, the congressionally appointed special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction.

Afghan forces seem unprepared to take over when the Americans depart. According to one recent audit by Sopko’s office, a U.S. contractor was unable, “because […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

The new Gilded Age: Close to half of all super-PAC money comes from 50 donors

Stephan:  One of the good things to come out of this year's electoral process, at least I hope it produces a good result, is the awakening many have had as to how truly corrupt and rigged our democracy has become. Citizens United to my mind, at least since Dred Cott v. Sanford, is arguably the worst decision ever made by the Supreme Court -- although Bush v Gore is right up there.  This report should outrage you. A nation of 317 million people is having the course of their lives determined by a self-selected committee of the uber-rich. The issue to me is not their positions, some are social progressives, many more Rightists, but that there are only a handful of them.  This is what Neo-feudalism looks like. This is what the Founders or their families had come to North America to get away from.

The Netherlands is making moves to ban all non-electric vehicles by 2025

Stephan:  This is very good news and a living example of the kind of thinking the world needs, and the kind of social policy wellness-based formulation that is required.
Tesla in Amsterdam

Tesla in Amsterdam

Electric vehicles – including self-driving cars – are clearly the future of personal transportation, but the question remains: when does the future begin, exactly?

If the Netherlands has its way, we now have an answer. There are moves within the country to ban all petrol and diesel vehicle sales by 2025, meaning only new electric cars would thereafter be approved on Dutch roads – although existing fossil-fuel-based vehicles could continue puttering around until their engines give out.

While it’s an extreme proposal, a majority of the lower house in the Dutch parliament supported the motion, meaning there’s a chance it could be passed into law. Under the plan, all emissions-based cars would be outlawed, at least in terms of new sales. That means fuel-efficient hybrids would also be banned, although hydrogen fuel cell cars would be permitted.

It’s an ambitious plan, and it’s certainly not the first time the Netherlands has backed the environment with big ideas in terms of transport technology. The country is currently working […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments