Stephan: In my search for information on trends I often start with primary peer-reviewed journals and then look for a popular presentation of the material. But in this case, although parts of this paper may be a little technical (mostly you can skip the statistics) I decided that the primary paper was the most important and clearest presentation of this data.
For sometime I have been looking for a study on why Theocratic Rightists as a cohort seem so unaware of and disconnected from actual facts. It isn't just that many believe the world was created in six days about 6,000 years ago, although that is factor. What particularly has concerned me is their lack of ability of distinguish actual facts from political polemic; that being the major defining characteristic of Republican conservatives. As the report concludes, "the present work shows that political conservatism is positively related to seeing profoundness in pseudo-profound bullshit statements."
Well, others have gotten interested as well, and one research team has finally done the heavy lifting to answer the question, and publish. Here is there paper as published.
Citation: Pfattheicher S, Schindler S (2016) Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0153419. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153419.
Credit: theresurgent.com
Abstract
The present research investigates the associations between holding favorable views of potential Democratic or Republican candidates for the US presidency 2016 and seeing profoundness in bullshit statements. In this contribution, bullshit is used as a technical term which is defined as communicative expression that lacks content, logic, or truth from the perspective of natural science. We used the Bullshit Receptivity scale (BSR) to measure seeing profoundness in bullshit statements. The BSR scale contains statements that have a correct syntactic structure and seem to be sound and meaningful on first reading but are actually vacuous. Participants (N = 196; obtained via Amazon Mechanical Turk) rated the profoundness of bullshit statements (using the BSR) and provided favorability ratings of three Democratic (Hillary Clinton, Martin O’Malley, and Bernie Sanders) and three Republican candidates for US president (Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump). Participants also completed a measure of political liberalism/conservatism. Results revealed that favorable views of all three Republican candidates were positively related to judging bullshit statements as profound. The smallest correlation was found for Donald Trump. Although we […]
The link to the abstract is broken.
I was really looking forward to reading the rest of the article about bullshit – but it wasn’t available. Kind of like Trump will be if elected President.
The corrected link is: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0153419