GOP won’t stop terror suspects from owning guns because right-wing nuts are a threat — and their base

Stephan:  I think this is a pretty good assessment of where we are in the U.S. concerning self-created White militias, although it doesn't get into the "Constitutional Sheriff's" aspect of it. I think this is also a good assessment of the connection between the gun demographic and the Republican Party. To me this is a very worrisome trend. Gun sales have gone up dramatically since Orlando. And at the same time mass murders by psychologically disordered individuals are increasing. Are we going to become a country where people routinely go around carrying a weapon? I have been in places like that. They call them war zones. Really. That's what the Founders intended?
Pete Santilli Credit: YouTube

Pete Santilli
Credit: YouTube

A week before Christmas, a small-town Ohio police chief spotted an SUV going 20 mph below the speed limit and stopped the motorist on suspicion of texting while driving.

The chief glimpsed a loaded 9 mm Smith and Wesson handgun in a bag between the passenger’s feet — but the routine stop became tense after he noticed the driver’s name on a national terrorist watch list.

Newtown police later said the driver, a right-wing Internet broadcaster named Pete Santilli, was not actually listed in terror database — but the incident sheds some light on conservative reluctance to ban suspected terrorists and the mentally ill from owning firearms.

Put simply: An awful lot of right-wing conservatives believe their Second Amendment rights kick in when their First Amendment talents fail — and they stoke their fears of government overreach with paranoid conspiracy theories that sometimes resemble mental illness.

The 51-year-old Santilli, who became radicalized by 9/11 “truther” conspiracy theories and hosted militia members and other right-wing extremists on his “Off […]

Read the Full Article

2 Comments

Microsoft’s Massive LinkedIn Deal Is a Sign of Something Dangerous

Stephan:  This is a good assessment of what is happening financially. I don't agree with her conclusion, however. Yes, this has the potential to become a huge bubble, there is risk. But it is measured. I see this as part of the Neo-feudalism Trend. These companies are buying back their own stock so that a smaller group can control more. This is part of the shift of the locus of real power from geographically based nation states to virtual corporate states.

Microsoft-Logo-HDYou know something is deeply wrong in our market system when a company like Microsoft, which has $100 billion in cash sitting in bank accounts (much of it offshore), decides it needs to borrow billions to fund its acquisition of the social networking platform LinkedIn.

The deal highlights one crucial way in which our market system is no longer serving the real economy. Why would a cash-rich firm like Microsoft go into debt and cause ratings agency Moody’s to put it on a possible downgrade list? Because it will save around $9 billion in U.S. taxes by doing so. Debt is tax deductible, and borrowing will save Microsoft money relative to bringing overseas cash back home and paying the U.S. corporate tax rate on it.

There are so many dysfunctional things here, it’s hard to know where to begin. As I’ve often written, I find it rich that tech companies in particular try to avoid paying their fare share of U.S. taxes, given that the federal government funded so many of the things that make them […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment

Sex by the numbers: This is how many partners men and women average in a lifetime

Stephan:  The number of sex partners is a subject, if my life is an indicator, people rarely discuss. I came of age during that magic time between 1960 when oral contraceptives became available until 1981 when the AIDS crisis began. A time when sex seemed consequence-free, and fun. For all that I don't remember many detailed conversations where someone listed sex partners. It's just assumed there were others and so what? Well here is some data. I think it will surprise you.
Credit: oleg66 via iStock/Salon

Credit: oleg66 via iStock/Salon

Sex is a sticky enough subject as is. But complicating matters is the idea that, in general, we need to partner up to get the deed done. There are those who stick to one lover and there are others who opt for more. Unfortunately, some see sex as a numbers game, and a high score doesn’t always get you a winning ticket.

According to a survey of more than 2,000 people in the U.S. and Europe, men believe women who have had 14 partners or more are “too promiscuous.” Women thought the same of men who have had 15 partners or more.

The survey, conducted by SuperDrug Online Doctor, found men to be more likely than female participants to inflate the number of sexual partners they’ve had. Women, on the other hand, were more likely to deflate the number of partner’s they’ve bedded. The majority of both genders (67.4 percent of women and 58.6 percent of men) claim they’ve never lied about the number of people they’ve slept […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Fear, Loathing and Brexit

Stephan:  Here is Paul Krugman's case on the upcoming British vote on whether to stay in the EU or not. I agree with him, although I think the British may choose to leave. If that happens I would predict that Scotland will leave Great Britain. In any case, this is a history changing moment. What I don't see in either Krugman's assessment, or that of most other commentators is the role of Muslim migration and its massive impact on all of Europe, including the Brexit issue.
Credit: www.funds-europe.com

Credit: www.funds-europe.com

There are still four and a half months to go before the presidential election. But there’s a vote next week that could matter as much for the world’s future as what happens here: Britain’s referendum on whether to stay in the European Union.

Unfortunately, this vote is a choice between bad and worse — and the question is which is which.

Not to be coy: I would vote Remain. I’d do it in full awareness that the E.U. is deeply dysfunctional and shows few signs of reforming. But British exit — Brexit — would probably make things worse, not just for Britain, but for Europe as a whole.

The straight economics is clear: Brexit would make Britain poorer. It wouldn’t necessarily lead to a trade war, but it would definitely hurt British trade with the rest of Europe, reducing […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment

A first: More workers at online sites than newspapers

Stephan:  The Decline of Newspapers Trend began in 1990 and has only accelerated as time has gone on.  But I think that is only part of the story. What is not discussed is that nothing has really arisen in the vacuum left by shrinking newspapers to replace the role they played in news aggregation and investigative reporting. Investigative journalism costs money and takes time, and few online publications are able or do make the commitment to do it. Instead what we see in its place is advocacy and disinformation operations. When combined with the degradation of public education, it leaves the U.S. with an electorate too ignorant to make informed judgments about political candidates.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics has been charting the demise of newspapers, and its latest numbers reveal what many in the industry have been witnessing. Newspaper employment, as of March, had dropped to 183,200, compared with 197,800 working in “Internet publishing and broadcasting.”

An analysis by the Nieman Journalism Lab charts the beginning of the end of newspapers to the dawn of the Internet Age in 1990. That year, newspaper employment hit a peak of 457,800. It is down 60 percent.

Some print publications are dumping paper and going online while keeping many of their reporters, editors and administrative staff.

Said Nieman, “It’s safe to assume that newspaper jobs will continue to evaporate. Most small and mid-sized metro papers are struggling to find new revenue as print advertising and circulation decline and online advertising fails to make up the difference.”

Read the Full Article

No Comments