About 35 people attended the meeting at the Jacques Cousteau Coastal Center in Tuckerton to discuss ways […]
Wednesday, September 14th, 2016
Nate Dvorak and Bailey Nelson, - The Gallup Organization
Stephan: When I was a boy workers felt strongly identified with the businesses they worked for, and most expected to work their whole lives for that company, and retire with a company pension that would allow them to live a comfortable life, not so very different from when they were employed.
All of that is gone. Now it is a Gig economy, and few people care about the company for which they work. Here are the facts.
Just 23% of U.S. employees strongly agree that they can apply their organization’s values to their work every day, according to Gallup, and only 27% strongly agree that they “believe in” their organization’s values.
These findings should be alarming to leaders, as they raise fundamental questions about whether workers buy into their company’s values and culture — or what leaders say their company’s values and culture are.
Gaps Between Desired Culture and Real Culture
Part of the problem is that “organizational culture” isn’t easy to define. It has been defined in myriad ways, from broad descriptions of employee behavior to academic philosophies and perspectives.
Gallup has found that the most useful definitions of culture are simple and actionable. We define culture as how employees interact and how work gets done. Our research also shows that the ways that work gets done vary across companies — and this variance affects organizational performance.
Unfortunately, our research also shows that in many companies, gaps exist between the desired culture — the one leaders envision and strive to realize — and the culture that employees experience.
These gaps create inconsistency and confusion for employees and customers. The most successful companies identify these gaps and implement strategies, systems and processes […]
2 Comments
Tuesday, September 13th, 2016
ANAHAD O’CONNOR, - The New York Times
Stephan: First we had the tobacco industry that hired some academic whores to make the case that cancer had nothing to do with smoking. Now we have the sugar industry corrupting another group of academics, too weak and ethically challenged to say, No. This is what you get in a culture whose only social priority is profit, who cares what it does to people's health.
Credit: iStock
The sugar industry paid scientists in the 1960s to play down the link between sugar and heart disease and promote saturated fat as the culprit instead, newly released historical documents show.
The internal sugar industry documents, recently discovered by a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, and published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, suggest that five decades of research into the role of nutrition and heart disease, including many of today’s dietary recommendations, may have been largely shaped by the sugar industry.
“They were able to derail the discussion about sugar for decades,” said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at U.C.S.F. and an author of the JAMA paper.
The documents show that a trade group called the Sugar Research Foundation, known today as the Sugar Association, paid three Harvard scientists the equivalent of about $50,000 in today’s dollars to publish a 1967 […]
No Comments