Leaked Catalogue Reveals a Vast Array of Military Spy Gear Offered to U.S. Police

Stephan:  Here is the quite alarming latest on the growing trend of the American Police State. The East German Stazi would have been drooling at this level of support. Tonight, I listened to what was billed as the "Commander-in-Chief" interviews on MNSBC. It was an example of some of the worst corporate journalism I have seen in a season notable for its shoddy sycophancy. Issues like the growing linkage of police and military, of course, never came up. Nor were there any questions about whether it is healthy for a democracy to spend 54% of its national budget on the military/intelligence/corporate industry. Eisenhower warned us, but nobody listened and now we are reaping the consequences.

military-spy-feature-final-article-headerA confidential, 120-page catalogue of spy equipment, originating from British defense firm Cobham and circulated to U.S. law enforcement, touts gear that can intercept wireless calls and text messages, locate people via their mobile phones, and jam cellular communications in a particular area.

The catalogue was obtained by The Intercept as part of a large trove of documents originating within the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, where spokesperson Molly Best confirmed Cobham wares have been purchased but did not provide further information. The document provides a rare look at the wide range of electronic surveillance tactics used by police and militaries in the U.S. and abroad, offering equipment ranging from black boxes that can monitor an entire town’s cellular signals to microphones hidden in lighters and cameras hidden in trashcans. Markings date it to 2014.

Cobham, recently cited among several major British firms exporting surveillance technology to oppressive regimes, has counted police in the United States among its clients, Cobham spokesperson Greg Caires confirmed. The company spun off its “Tactical Communications and Surveillance” business into “Domo Tactical Communications” earlier this year, selling the entity to another company and presumably shifting many of those clients into it. Caires declined […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Tree-planting drones to speed up reforestation efforts

Stephan:  Here is a very interesting development in forestry management, that could make a significant difference in forests destroyed by climate change. As with all technologies the real issue is how it is used. This is a good example of a situation where the drone technology could be very useful but, I would argue, not focused on herbicides as described here. Drones could make a lot of difference, but we need to use them with a non-dominionist world view in cooperation with the Earth's meta-systems.
DroneSeed's drones would rapidly reforest logged lands by planting seeds, spraying for invasive species, and monitoring the tree growth process.

DroneSeed’s drones would rapidly reforest logged lands by planting seeds, spraying for invasive species, and monitoring the tree growth process.

Planting trees in remote forest locations is a slow, laborious process that still relies on humans with shovels to do all the work. DroneSeed, a company based in the Pacific Northwest, wants to drastically modernize that process by employing squadrons of drones to plant seeds, spray for invasive species, and monitor the tree growth process.

Forests are important for mitigating the effects of climate change, acting as carbon sinks that absorb as much as 30 percent of annual CO2 emissions. Logging can also be a means to sequester carbon, with wood products in some cases a substitute for fossil-fuel heavy materials such as concrete and steel. Either way, trees need planting, and DroneSeed works with both forestry companies to reforest logged areas, and environmental NGOs to combat deforestation.

In the case of timber companies that work about 7 […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Over $628 Billion in Public Costs Cleaning Up Fukushima and Not Near Done

Stephan:  Because of the sums involved I have held this story for a few days waiting to see if any modification or contradiction turned up. Nuclear power when something goes wrong is a disaster that never ends. Everything is fine until it isn't and then it is never right again. The Fukushima disaster, as this report describes has cost Japan -- mostly Japanese customers -- $628 billion, and no end is in sight.   It is becoming obvious that this is going to be a many year problem calculated in one or more trillions of dollars. Numbers so big people cannot visualize them; and that is just direct costs. There is also he human cost, like the rise in childhood cancers, the abandonment of towns, and this: Only 11% of the Japanese islands is arable and the loss of the Fukushima fields is a cultural and economic bleeding wound. I do not understand on the basis of the facts, how anyone can propose continuing nuclear. And yet in the U.S. 15 new nuclear power plants are in the works.
Fukushima workers

Fukushima workers

Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster, over $628 billion has been spent in the cleanup process and the cost is continuing to climb. Radioactive decontamination, waste disposal and compensation payments are included in this price. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) is asking for more taxpayer money to finish the job.

 

“There are numerous problems that are all interconnected, but one of the biggest that we are facing at the moment is the highly contaminated water that is being stored in huge steel tanks at the site,” Aileen Mioko-Smith, an anti-nuclear activist with the group Green Action Japan, told DW. “They are running out of space at the site to put these tanks, the water that is being generated on a daily basis means they have to keep constructing more, and the ones that are not welded have a history of leaking.”

After the nuclear accident TEPCO, and six other utility companies, all charged consumers at least 327 billion yen in rate hikes to help with the costs from the disaster.

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Costa Rica Is On A 113-Day Streak Using 100% Renewable Electricity

Stephan:  Here is some more good news about the transition out of the carbon era, this time a story of an entire country.
Costa Rico

Costa Rico

Costa Rica has managed to run on renewable energy for 113 days straight, putting it on course to break its own record from 2015, when it relied on nothing but renewables for 285 days of the year. In total, Costa Rica provided 99% of its energy needs last year with renewables alone. (emphasis added)

The country’s geography helps a lot. The majority of this power comes from hydroelectric plants, which are possible thanks to lots of rain and lots of mountains. But Costa Rica is also diversifying, with ventures in geothermal energy, and also solar—after all, a country doesn’t want to rely on a single source for all its power, especially in these times of unpredictable climate change.

In five years, Costa Rica plans to be carbon neutral. With electricity, this is completely achievable, it seems. But it still runs its cars on gasoline, so switching to electric cars will be far harder. The governments plans on work on offsetting those carbon emissions in other ways.

As […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Why We Still Don’t Have Better Batteries

Stephan:  Here is the latest on the battery trend, a follow up on a report SR published last March. We're getting closer, but we're not there yet.

ARPA-E_Strategic-logoEarlier this year, Ellen Williams, the director of ARPA-E, the U.S. Department of Energy’s advanced research program for alternative energy, made headlines when she told the Guardian newspaper that “We have reached some holy grails in batteries.”

Despite very promising results from the 75-odd energy-storage research projects that ARPA-E funds, however, the grail of compact, low-cost energy storage remains elusive.

A number of startups are closer to producing devices that are economical, safe, compact, and energy-dense enough to store energy at a cost of less than $100 a kilowatt-hour. Energy storage at that price would have a galvanic effect, overcoming the problem of powering a 24/7 grid with renewable energy that’s available only when the wind blows or the sun shines, and making electric vehicles lighter and less expensive.

But those batteries are not being commercialized at anywhere near the pace needed to hasten the shift from fossil fuels to renewables. Even Tesla CEO Elon Musk, hardly one to underplay the promise of new technology, has been forced to admit that, for now, the electric-car maker […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment