Illegal migration at US border at lowest point in 17 years: Kelly

Stephan:  As I have previously reported fewer foreign students are coming to American universities; fewer tourists are arriving on our shores. And, now, we see that fewer people are even crossing our southern border, as this report describes. The truth is: America is becoming a less attractive country. Those who voted for Trump I think thought that if there would be fewer immigrants they would be able to get employment that would otherwise have gone to foreigners. Underneath that I think the more fundamental issue is that America will remain a White country. What we are finding out is that there are a whole spectrum of jobs, such as agriculture jobs that White Americans don't want and won't do, so our agriculture system is at risk. Fewer doctors and nurses are coming so, particularly in rural areas, our already meager healthcare system is more impoverished. Fewer tech students are graduating and there are now fewer entrepreneurs and patents being granted and thus fewer jobs will be created in the future. And so it goes on and on.

American southern border wall
Credit: Justin Sullivan

Just five people were eating dinner on a recent weeknight at a Texas church that is a stopping point for newly arrived immigrants on the U.S.-Mexico border. On a typical night last year, hundreds of immigrants might come through the church.

Immigrants who are still coming say many people in their home countries are staying home amid fears about President Donald Trump‘s immigration rhetoric, putting off coming to the U.S. until they see how his policies play out.

“There are mothers who heard that Trump might change the law to remove parents and keep the children here,” said Jose Gonzalez, a 29-year-old father of two from El Salvador. “That stopped a lot of people.”

The first months of the new administration have seen a huge drop in the number of people being caught by agents on the U.S.-Mexico border, raising the possibility that a “Trump effect” is keeping migrants away.

Fewer than 12,500 people were caught at the southern border in March, the lowest monthly figure in at […]

Read the Full Article

2 Comments

America’s Pain Points

Stephan:  Over the past several weeks I have climbed up inside of the opioids crisis because it has become not only a trend but a local problem on my island. I have read studies and media reports doing this research and it is clear to me that the pharmaceutical industry, a small group of physicians, and the pharmacy distribution network in the U.S. are all knowingly complicit in this human disaster. The opioids epidemic is a stand out for the misery it produces, and it   perfectly illustrates what "healthcare" in the U.S. is about -- profit.  Turn people into addicts and then milk them of all the cash you can get. Am I exaggerating? Consider this: America claims less than 5% of the world’s population, yet it consumes roughly 80% of the world’s opioid supply.

PREVALENCE OF SHORT-TERM AND LONGER TERM OPIATE PAIN MEDICATION UTILIZATION

America claims less than 5% of the world’s population, yet it consumes roughly 80% of the world’s opioid supply. (emphasis added)

Knowing the potential for misuse of these medications, and facing an increase in opioid-related deaths in this country, we wanted a deeper understanding of how patients in the U.S. are using these medications so we can identify additional ways to protect them from the risks associated with their use.

In A Nation in Pain, our research revealed a drop in short-term use of opioids, and stabilization in the number of patients using these medications longer term, which is in contrast to the increases seen in the past. Both trends indicate that doctors are being more cautious about prescribing these pain medications.

However, the research uncovered some concerning increases in the amount of prescription opioid medications Americans use, and the frequency in which these medications are used in dangerously high doses and in risky combinations with other medications.

Prescription Opiate Trends Increase Potential for […]

Read the Full Article

4 Comments

Is U.S. Preeminence in High-Tech Medicine a Myth? The Case of Cystic Fibrosis

Stephan:  Here is another proof that we have an illness profit system instead of true healthcare in the U.S..  A recent survey of patients with Cystic Fibrosis concluded, "The results are disturbing: on average, Canadian patients live 10 years longer than American patients. And the gap has been widening for the past two decades." Think about that for a moment: Many CF patients die in childhood. Those who reach adulthood, in the U.S.,  live to an average age of 37.  If you are in Canada on average your child will have 10 years more years of life than a child in the U.S.  How do you feel about that? Note also that a profit making insurance industry such as we have in the U.S. not only imposes vastly greater costs, but produces inferior social outcomes. What needs to happen isn't going to happen until we make wellbeing not profit the first priority. Every other country in the developed world has figured this out. Why can't the United States?

 

 

Median Age of Survival for Patients with Cystic Fibrosis over Time — Median age of survival (years)

U.S. health care has many well-documented shortcomings. However, it is often assumed that, because we invest so heavily in technology and specialists, our health care system performs well for patients who have rare or complex diseases.

New research shows that we should be skeptical of that assumption. A recent study in the Annals of Internal Medicine compares the health outcomes of U.S. and Canadian patients with cystic fibrosis, an incurable, genetic disease that affects about one in 10,000 people in both countries. The results are disturbing: on average, Canadian patients live 10 years longer than American patients. And the gap has been widening for the past two decades (see exhibit).

The researchers suggest the likely culprit is the significant gaps in health insurance coverage among U.S. children and adults under age 65. Uninsured patients with cystic fibrosis, they find, face a much greater risk of early death than their insured peers. Of particular […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Healthy soil is the real key to feeding the world

Stephan:  In 1989, two friends of mine, Christopher Bird and Peter Tompkins, who had written the 1970s mega-bestseller, The Secret Life of Plants, followed it with Secrets of the Soil. Their basic argument in the second book, which they had learned doing the research for the first, was that all wellness based agriculture starts with the soil. They presented an argument that the chemical industrial mono-culture would ultimately implode precisely because the soil was seen mostly as just a medium in which plants grew, and its condition was of only secondary importance. We can now see that Tompkins, Bird, Rudolf Steiner, Alan Chadwick, Hugh Lovell, and others were correct and the chemical companies were wrong. Here is the latest from a professor at University of Washington.

One of the biggest modern myths about agriculture is that organic farming is inherently sustainable. It can be, but it isn’t necessarily. After all, soil erosion from chemical-free tilled fields undermined the Roman Empire and other ancient societies around the world. Other agricultural myths hinder recognizing the potential to restore degraded soils to feed the world using fewer agrochemicals.

When I embarked on a six-month trip to visit farms around the world to research my forthcoming book, “Growing a Revolution: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life,” the innovative farmers I met showed me that regenerative farming practices can restore the world’s agricultural soils. In both the developed and developing worlds, these farmers rapidly rebuilt the fertility of their degraded soil, which then allowed them to maintain high yields using far less fertilizer and fewer pesticides.

Their experiences, and the results that I saw on their farms in North and South Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Ghana and Costa Rica, offer compelling evidence that the key to sustaining highly productive agriculture lies in rebuilding healthy, […]

Read the Full Article

4 Comments

Time travelling to the mother tongue

Stephan:  Have you wondered where did language start? Where did languages come from? Here is some recent research.

T
he sounds of languages that died thousands of years ago have been brought to life again through technology that uses statistics in a revolutionary new way.

As a word is uttered it vibrates air, and the shape of this soundwave can be measured and turned into a series of numbers

John Aston

No matter whether you speak English or Urdu, Waloon or Waziri, Portuguese or Persian, the roots of your language are the same. Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the mother tongue – shared by several hundred contemporary languages, as well as many now extinct, and spoken by people who lived from about 6,000 to 3,500 BC on the steppes to the north of the Caspian Sea.

They left no written texts and although historical linguists have, since the 19th century, painstakingly reconstructed the language from daughter languages, the question of how it actually sounded was assumed to be permanently out of reach.

Now, researchers at the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford have developed a sound-based method to move back through […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments