California invested heavily in solar power. Now there’s so much that other states are sometimes paid to take it

Stephan:  Republican Donald Trump and his band of zombies and the zombie Congrress may be committed to backing the continuation and expansion of carbon energy, but not everyone is, and the difference in social outcomes of these two paths is becoming increasingly obvious, as this report lays out. You can be sure that Democratic governors and state legislatures throughout the nation are paying close attention; there may even be a few Republicans who aren't owned by carbon energy interests who watching and learning.

In Western Kern County, solar panels on almost two square miles of land form the Beacon Solar Project, owned by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. (
Credit: Mel Melcon/Los Angels Times

On 14 days during March, Arizona utilities got a gift from California: free solar power.

Well, actually better than free. California produced so much solar power on those days that it paid Arizona to take excess electricity its residents weren’t using to avoid overloading its own power lines.

It happened on eight days in January and nine in February as well. All told, those transactions helped save Arizona electricity customers millions of dollars this year, though grid operators declined to say exactly how much. And California also has paid other states to take power.

The number of days that California dumped its unused solar electricity would have been even higher if the state hadn’t ordered some solar plants to reduce production — even as natural gas power plants, which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, continued generating electricity.

Solar and wind power […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment

More Than Half of Teens Are Having Sex and Most Use Birth Control

Stephan:  I consider this to be good news. I expect teenagers to become sexually active, perhaps because that was my life. Perhaps because I study social outcome data and abstinence only is a dreadful policy and life choice; it produces markedly inferior outcomes.  What matters to me is that teens have proper sex education, at the appropriation time, devoid of religious or political considerations, and that they use contraception. It appears they do. If this data is consistent with other research the majority of the 20% who became active but did not use contraception were associated with a conservative religious movement. However, as the report also notes we still have a ways to go. Sex ed needs to get better and be more widely taught. In my view it should be taught as part of a course on how to be a healthy, happy, productive human being, based only on data, with no religious or political considerations in the course other than the acknowledgment that they exist. We know what works. The real question is why are we doing that?

Credit: JPC-PROD via Shutterstock

Just over half of American teenagers are sexually active, and most report using some form of contraception, according to new research.

The study from the National Center for Health Statistics found that 55% of teens said they were having sex by age 18, and 80% of those teens used some form of protection during their first time. The findings come from surveys with 4,134 male and female teens ages 15 to 19 from 2011 through 2015.

 Overall, fewer teens are having sex now than in the past. 42% of teen girls and 44% of teen boys reported having sex at least once—down about 9% for girls and 16% for boys from when the government group began tracking such numbers in 1988. The most common reasons teens gave for not having sex was that it was against their religion or morals, that they […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Trump to roll back aid for the poor — but protect millions in housing subsidies he’s already receiving

Stephan:  The level of corruption in government, science, agriculture, the security-military, and education the United States is astonishing. And it starts at the top.

According to a report in the Washington Post, President Donald Trump’s proposed budget would slash funding for programs that provide shelter for the poor but would leave in place housing subsidies paid to landlords.

The report notes that Trump would continue to be the beneficiary of such subsidies after receiving millions of dollars as a part-owner of Starrett City, the nation’s largest subsidized housing complex. According to Trump’s most recent financial disclosure, his 4 percent ownership stake in the complex garnered him at least $5 million between January of last year and April 15

According to a spokesperson for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the partnership that owns the complex has received more than $490 million in subsidies since May 2013 – $38 million of which has come since Trump took office.

Starrett City is a complex of 46 brick towers west of New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport, and Trump once lauded it as “one of the best investments I ever made.”

The report notes that actually it was Trump’s father who invested in the complex.

“Upon Fred Trump’s […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Rick Joyner: God Elected Trump Because He Knew America Would Not Survive A Clinton Presidency

Stephan:  Let me open a window for you into the parallel universe of the Theocratic Right. And don't laugh. They are very serious about this.

Rick Joyner

Right-wing pastor Rick Joyner posted a video on his Facebook page today declaring that God intervened to save America by electing Donald Trump because He knew that a Hillary Clinton presidency would have been the fruition of the satanic effort to destroy this nation.

Joyner said that there is an insane poisonous rage running through those who oppose Trump because they know that Satan’s agenda has been thwarted by God.

“Believe it or not, evil was trying to take over our country,” he said. “It was the most systematic and blatant attempt to pervert our nation, to destroy our nation. I think it was a satanic attempt and it was working until Trump was elected.”

“I don’t think we would have survived a Hillary Clinton [presidency], even a first term,” Joyner added. “I think we would have, probably at best, fallen to third-world status with an unbelievable economic catastrophe, many other things. We would have imploded. Instead, absolutely to everybody’s shock, things were turned around. I do believe it was a miracle of […]

Read the Full Article

2 Comments

What the Republicans’ Senate Health-Care Bill Means for America

Stephan:  Senator Elizabeth Warren is right, in my view, the Senate "healthcare" bill is a tax cut for the rich dripping with the blood and suffering of the old, the poor, the young, and the disabled. I'm sorry I just don't think it is possible to be a Republican and an ethical person. You can be rich, you can be charming, you can smile a lot and be a Republican, but you cannot be a moral compassionate person and support the Republican agenda.

Illustration by Matt Chase

On Thursday, Senate Republicans unveiled their bill to replace the Affordable Care Act. Below, New Yorker writers offer some initial reactions to the news.

The Senate bill is really three separate proposals. In the private-insurance market, it amounts to what Larry Levitt, a health-care expert at the Kaiser Family Foundation, calls “Obamacare-lite.” As for Medicaid—the federal program that provides health services to roughly seventy-five million Americans, most of whom are poor or elderly or are children—the bill involves much bigger, and more harmful, changes. Finally, the legislation would deliver a hefty tax cut to some of the wealthiest households in the country.

In the individual market, the bill offers somewhat more generous subsidies for people buying individual plans on government-run exchanges than the ones in the House G.O.P.’s American Health Care Act. Because the subsidies would be tied to income and the actual cost of insurance rather than age, they would be substantially bigger for old people, who face much higher premiums. This would alleviate one of […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment