On Thursday, the Columbia Law Review published one of the most important and topical scholarly articles in recent memory, “Delegation at the Founding.” Its authors, Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley, put forth a sweeping argument: They assert that an ascendant legal theory championed by conservative originalists has no actual basis in history. That theory, called the nondelegation doctrine, holds that the Constitution puts strict limits on Congress’ ability to let the executive branch set rules and regulations. Congress, for instance, could not direct the Environmental Protection Agency to set air quality standards that “protect public health,” and let the agency decide what limits on pollution are necessary to meet that goal.Nondelegation doctrine has enormous consequences for the federal government’s ability to function, since Congress typically sets broad goals and directs agencies to figure out how to achieve them. The theory is supported by a majority of the current Supreme Court; in 2019, Justice Neil Gorsuch signaled his eagerness to apply […]
Saturday, March 20th, 2021
Neil Gorsuch Supports an Originalist Theory That Would Destroy Modern Governance
Author: MARK JOSEPH STERN
Source: Slate
Publication Date: MARCH 19, 202110:58 AM
Link: Neil Gorsuch Supports an Originalist Theory That Would Destroy Modern Governance
Source: Slate
Publication Date: MARCH 19, 202110:58 AM
Link: Neil Gorsuch Supports an Originalist Theory That Would Destroy Modern Governance
Stephan: Most media attention is focused on Congress, but in the coming months we are going to be significantly impacted by Trump's choices for the Supreme Court. Here is a first take.
The Constitution was meant to be changed when needed as time went on and things changed in the world.