The MAGAt Republican hysterical obsession with controlling women, as I have told you over and over, is having all manner of consequences in American healthcare, far beyond a woman being able to choose whether to terminate a pregnancy. I have published in SR reports about how this is affecting medical school training, and the fact that OB/GYN physicians are leaving Red states, making healthcare for women more problematic. Now here is a factual account of a hospital simply ending pregnancy delivery services altogether. In Sandpoint, Oklahoma the only hospital in the city will no longer offer obstetrical services, period.
As long as I am on this subject let me give you my view of abortion. The whole abortion argument is founded on materialism. When a woman aborts a fetus no one is killed. Rather the woman is deciding that she chooses not to be the channel for that eternal self to incarnate its particular personality manifestation through her uterus. Thus, the eternal self must find another route into spacetime. I actually know of a case in which a 25-year-old woman miscarried, and shortly afterwards her 28-year-old sister became pregnant. When the little girl who came through that birth was about four years old, and first met her now aunt she said, "I tried to come through you but it didn't work, so I chose my mom."
Idaho’s Bonner General Health, the only hospital in Sandpoint, announced Friday afternoon that it will no longer provide obstetrical services to the city of more than 9,000 people, meaning patients will have to drive 46 miles for labor and delivery care moving forward.
“We have made every effort to avoid eliminating these services,” said Ford Elsaesser, the hospital’s board president, in a news release. “We hoped to be the exception, but our challenges are impossible to overcome now.”
The hospital said it will continue to provide women’s health services at Sandpoint Women’s Health and collaborate with Kootenai Health in Coeur d’Alene, which is about an hour from Sandpoint, to provide obstetrical care.
Sandpoint Women’s Health will not accept new obstetrics patients effective immediately and offered a referral list for patients to use for […]
John B Alexander
on Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 9:16 am
The answer on abortion should be “Don’t want one, don’t have one.” Her choice – and never forced.
Albus Eddie
on Monday, March 20, 2023 at 5:33 am
Sadly, the powers that be have little interest in actual bodily sovereignty. This has been demonstrated up to and including the Supreme Court on numerous occasions. They understand how profound the implications would truly be.
The answer on abortion should be “Don’t want one, don’t have one.” Her choice – and never forced.
Sadly, the powers that be have little interest in actual bodily sovereignty. This has been demonstrated up to and including the Supreme Court on numerous occasions. They understand how profound the implications would truly be.