In Brussels, NATO officials have devised a plan to lock in long-term military support for Ukraine so that a possible Trump administration can’t get in the way.
In Ankara, Turkish officials have reviewed the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 policy road map for clues into Donald Trump’s designs on Syria.
In Atlanta, Austin and Lincoln, Nebraska, top ministers from Germany and Canada have met with Republican governors to shore up relations on the American right.
And in Washington, Trump’s return is the dominant topic at monthly breakfast meetings of ambassadors from European countries. At one of those meetings, the top envoy from one country asked his colleagues whether they were engaged in a fool’s errand.
“Can we really prepare for Trump?” this person asked, according to another top diplomat. “Or do we rather have to wait and see what the new reality […]
Notice, dear reader, how the focus of the article is maintaining the work of the Empire? How can war be best continued. That’s what it really is all about. Never mind that a significant section of the American public is sick and tired of war. The American public doesn’t matter in the equation. Now the article did state that the European leadership is moving toward some of Trump’s goals. What might that be? Why to force the countries of Europe to support their own defense instead of sucking money from the US taxpayer. That will create its own problems, of course, as the American taxpayer has been subsidizing the European welfare state while watching others enjoy things it cannot even dream having. Cutting the welfare state while boosting the military will have its own blow back in Europe. What fun times to watch the outcome.