Last October, senior Obama officials anonymously unveiled to the Washington Post their newly minted ‘disposition matrix’, a complex computer system that will be used to determine how a terrorist suspect will be ‘disposed of’: indefinite detention, prosecution in a real court, assassination-by-CIA-drones, etc. Their rationale for why this was needed now, a full 12 years after the 9/11 attack:

Among senior Obama administration officials, there is a broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade. Given the way al-Qaida continues to metastasize, some officials said no clear end is in sight. . . . That timeline suggests that the United States has reached only the midpoint of what was once known as the global war on terrorism.’

On Thursday, the Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on whether the statutory basis for this ‘war’ – the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) – should be revised (meaning: expanded). This is how Wired’s Spencer Ackerman (soon to be the Guardian US’s national security editor) described the most significant exchange:

‘Asked at a Senate hearing today how long the war on terrorism will last, Michael Sheehan, the assistant secretary […]