Let’s get this out of the way at the front. The study — the one I’m about to delineate — does not mean that there is a causal relationship between Republican presidents and infant mortality.
It means that after the authors controlled for certain relevant variables — e.g., education attainment, the unemployment rate, and economic inequality — there was a correlation between a GOP administration and higher rates of infant mortality. (Cue angry comment from Internet troll who does not even know what a regression analysis is).
Now that we’ve (hopefully) subordinated any knee-jerk responses, some new research (gated) indicates that, for reasons we do not yet know, infant mortality is higher under Republican presidents since 1965 (through 2010) than Democratic presidents.
The researchers, responsibly, say that further research is needed to determine if there is statistical causation. But we do know that when a Republican is in the White House, infant mortality — while dropping absolutely over the past seven-plus decades — is 3 percent higher. And, as an important side note, throw away the canard that we have the best health care system in the world; the U.S. ranks 31st, neighbored by Slovakia and Chile, in infant mortality.
The study’s finding do […]