SAN FRANCISCO — Hackers hired to evaluate the security of e-voting machines used in California found serious flaws that could allow for vote tampering in all three systems studied. The defects included the ability to overwrite firmware, install malicious applications, forge voter cards and gain access to the inside of voting machines by unfastening screws that were supposed to be inaccessible. The defects were found in machines provided by Sequoia Voting Systems, Hart Intercivic and Diebold Elections Systems. The team was unable to test equipment sold by Election Systems & Software because the vendor dragged its feet in cooperating with the review, which is authorized under California law. The e-voting machine assessment was part of a ‘top-to-bottom’ review that Secretary of State Debra Bowen undertook earlier this year into all ballot machines used in the state, whether or not they are computerized. Several ‘red teams’ were given access to the source code and user manuals of e-voting machines and directed to hack them if possible. ‘The red teams demonstrated that the security mechanisms provided for all systems analyzed were inadequate to ensure accuracy and integrity of the election results and of the systems that provide those […]
Tuesday, July 31st, 2007
California e-Voting Machines Have More Holes than Swiss Cheese
Author: DAN GOODIN
Source: The Register
Publication Date: Monday 30th July 2007 23:47 GMT
Link: California e-Voting Machines Have More Holes than Swiss Cheese
Source: The Register
Publication Date: Monday 30th July 2007 23:47 GMT
Link: California e-Voting Machines Have More Holes than Swiss Cheese
Stephan: Somehow we make hundreds of thousands of ATM machines that process millions of transactions each day, virtually flawlessly. But we cannot make a voting machine that can defeat the attacks of a cola fueled hacker. Why are there so many ways into these machines to manipulate the outcome? Why is that do you think?