Americans are spending more money than ever to treat spine problems, but their backs are not getting any better. Those are the findings of a report in The Journal of the American Medical Association, which found that spending on spine treatments in the United States totaled nearly $86 billion in 2005, a rise of 65 percent from 1997, after adjusting for inflation. Even so, the proportion of people with impaired function because of spine problems increased during the period, even after controlling for an aging population. ‘You’d think if you’re putting a lot of money into a problem, you’d see some improvements in health status,’ said Brook I. Martin, research scientist at the Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine at the University of Washington and lead author on the study, published Wednesday. ‘We’re putting a lot of money into this problem, and it’s a big investment in health care expenditures, but we’re not seeing health status commensurate with those investments.’ The report is the latest to suggest that the nation is losing its battle against back pain, and that many popular treatments may be ineffective or overused. Researchers have produced conflicting data about the effectiveness of spinal […]
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008
Americans Spend More to Treat Spine Woes
Author: TARA PARKER-POPE
Source: The New York Times
Publication Date: 13-Feb-08
Link: Americans Spend More to Treat Spine Woes
Source: The New York Times
Publication Date: 13-Feb-08
Link: Americans Spend More to Treat Spine Woes
Stephan: Notice this piece doesn't even mention an entire spectrum of non-surgical, non-medication treatments - osteopathy, chiropractic, Rolfing - and offers no comparison statistics between the two approaches. Nor does it mention the role of preventive therapies. This is part of what is wrong with American healthcare. Like medieval guilds, some health specialties can't pitch their tent in the public square, even though their goods and services have value.