On Thursday, Senate Republicans unveiled their bill to replace the Affordable Care Act. Below, New Yorker writers offer some initial reactions to the news.
The Senate bill is really three separate proposals. In the private-insurance market, it amounts to what Larry Levitt, a health-care expert at the Kaiser Family Foundation, calls “Obamacare-lite.” As for Medicaid—the federal program that provides health services to roughly seventy-five million Americans, most of whom are poor or elderly or are children—the bill involves much bigger, and more harmful, changes. Finally, the legislation would deliver a hefty tax cut to some of the wealthiest households in the country.
In the individual market, the bill offers somewhat more generous subsidies for people buying individual plans on government-run exchanges than the ones in the House G.O.P.’s American Health Care Act. Because the subsidies would be tied to income and the actual cost of insurance rather than age, they would be substantially bigger for old people, who face much higher premiums. This would alleviate one of the House […]
I find it ironic that the tax cuts for the rich would happen right away(so they would open their pocketbooks for republicans before the up coming elections) and the cuts to Medicaid would come on slowly–mostly after the 2020 election. Are they hoping the poor will forget where their misery is coming from?