Research by UK and American scientists has struck another blow to the theory that Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) became extinct because they were less intelligent than our ancestors (Homo sapiens). The research team has shown that early stone tool technologies developed by our species, Homo sapiens, were no more efficient than those used by Neanderthals. Published today (26 August) in the Journal of Human Evolution, their discovery debunks a textbook belief held by archaeologists for more than 60 years. The team from the University of Exeter, Southern Methodist University, Texas State University, and the Think Computer Corporation, spent three years flintknapping (producing stone tools). They recreated stone tools known as ‘flakes,’ which were wider tools originally used by both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, and ‘blades,’ a narrower stone tool later adopted by Homo sapiens. Archaeologists often use the development of stone blades and their assumed efficiency as proof of Homo sapiens’ superior intellect. To test this, the team analysed the data to compare the number of tools produced, how much cutting-edge was created, the efficiency in consuming raw material and how long tools lasted. Blades were first produced by Homo sapiens during their colonization of Europe from Africa approximately […]
Monday, September 1st, 2008
New Evidence Debunks ‘Stupid’ Neanderthal Myth
Author: SARAH HOYLE
Source: University of Exeter (U.K.)
Publication Date: 25-Aug-08
Link: New Evidence Debunks ‘Stupid’ Neanderthal Myth
Source: University of Exeter (U.K.)
Publication Date: 25-Aug-08
Link: New Evidence Debunks ‘Stupid’ Neanderthal Myth
Stephan: The University of Exeter is the only university in the world to offer a degree course in Experimental Archaeology. This strand of archaeology focuses on understanding how people lived in the past by recreating their activities and replicating their technologies. Eren says: 'It was only by spending three years in the lab learning how to physically make these tools that we were able to finally replicate them accurately enough to come up with our findings.'