WASHINGTON — House Democrats are likely to jettison family planning funds for the low-income from an $825 billion economic stimulus bill, officials said late Monday, following a personal appeal from President Barack Obama at a time the administration is courting Republican critics of the legislation. Several officials said a final decision was expected on Tuesday, coinciding with Obama’s scheduled visit to the Capitol for separate meetings with House and Senate Republicans. The provision has emerged as a point of contention among Republicans, who criticize it as an example of wasteful spending that would neither create jobs nor otherwise improve the economy. Under the provision, states no longer would be required to obtain federal permission to offer family planning services – including contraceptives – under Medicaid, the health program for the low-income. Democrats considered the politically-potent change as congressional budget experts estimated it would take slightly longer for the overall legislation to achieve an impact on the economy than the administration projects. The Congressional Budget Office said the economy would feel the effects of almost two-thirds of the money over the next year and a half. The administration claims 75 percent of the funding would be […]
Tuesday, January 27th, 2009
Officials: Family Planning Money May Be Dropped
Author: DAVID ESPO and ANDREW TAYLOR
Source: The Associated Press
Publication Date: Jan 26, 10:34 PM (ET)
Link: Officials: Family Planning Money May Be Dropped
Source: The Associated Press
Publication Date: Jan 26, 10:34 PM (ET)
Link: Officials: Family Planning Money May Be Dropped
Stephan: The struggle over sex begins anew. There is a sickness in this country concerning sexuality. There is an anti-life strain in our culture that inflicts horror and pain on hundreds of thousands. Perhaps millions. And it costs us billions and billions of dollars to inflict this suffering on ourselves. How can anybody question that teaching young poor couples -- the people who use most of these services -- is not of benefit to both them, and society? What rational argument is there against such support? How is society not improved by rational family planning?
Even forgetting about the human tragedies, and considering the issue only from the perspective of money, the use of public funds, as the criterion, the data is clear and overwhelming. By any measure, whether STDs, child abuse, divorce, education, or poverty, rational family planning costs the public less by orders of magnitude than what results from blocking family planning.