As the Obama administration expands U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, military experts are warning that the United States is taking on security and political commitments that will last at least a decade and a cost that will probably eclipse that of the Iraq war. Since the invasion of Afghanistan eight years ago, the United States has spent $223 billion on war-related funding for that country, according to the Congressional Research Service. Aid expenditures, excluding the cost of combat operations, have grown exponentially, from $982 million in 2003 to $9.3 billion last year. The costs are almost certain to keep growing. The Obama administration is in the process of overhauling the U.S. approach to Afghanistan, putting its focus on long-term security, economic sustainability and development. That approach is also likely to require deployment of more American military personnel, at the very least to train additional Afghan security forces. Later this month, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, is expected to present his analysis of the situation in the country. The analysis could prompt an increase in U.S. troop levels to help implement President Obama’s new strategy. Military experts insist that the additional resources are […]
Monday, August 10th, 2009
Afghanistan War Costs to Top Iraq by 2010
Author: WALTER PINCUS
Source: Washington Post
Publication Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009
Link: Afghanistan War Costs to Top Iraq by 2010
Source: Washington Post
Publication Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009
Link: Afghanistan War Costs to Top Iraq by 2010
Stephan: This report makes it clear we are planning to buy a cold kind of peace in Afgrhanistan as we have done in the Middle East. Michael E. O'Hanlon, a senior fellow and military expert at the Brookings Institution, puts it well: 'We are creating a [long-term military aid] situation similar to the ones we have with Israel, Egypt and Jordan.' Why are we doing this?