WICHITA, Kan. — Abortion never came up in jurors’ brief deliberations Friday at the end of Scott Roeder’s trial in the murder of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller, according to the jury’s foreman. ‘It was never spoken of,’ said the 54-year-old, whose first service as a juror came in a trial that drew reporters and activists on both sides of the abortion issue from coast to coast. He said the jury discussed only the question of whether Roeder was guilty of first-degree murder for shooting Tiller while Tiller served as an usher in his Wichita church, and whether Roeder was guilty of aggravated assault for pointing a handgun at two people who tried to block his escape. Because of security concerns, the juror asked that his name not be used. He said he didn’t want to take any chances that someone might lash out against him. The guilty verdict was unanimous from the beginning of the deliberations, he said. ‘There wasn’t much to argue about.’ They found the evidence against Roeder ‘overwhelming.’ That’s why it took only 37 minutes to decide, he said. For security during the trial, he said, jurors were […]
Monday, February 1st, 2010
Foreman Says Abortion Never Came Up In Tiller Deliberations
Author: TIM POTTER
Source: McClatchy Newspapers
Publication Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010
Link: Foreman Says Abortion Never Came Up In Tiller Deliberations
Source: McClatchy Newspapers
Publication Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010
Link: Foreman Says Abortion Never Came Up In Tiller Deliberations
Stephan: This is what makes you proud to be an American. The individuals on this jury never got sucked into the craziness of either side. The jury trial is the last place in our society where an average person can exercise the power to do the right thing and see clear consequences. All human beings must have the undegradable right to control their own bodies, or freedom cannot be possible. This must be an absolute right for a democracy to function properly. People like Tiller are terrorists. What is the difference between an anti-abortionist terrorist who believes his Christian faith permits him to harass or kill, and a Muslim jihadist who feels his faith permits him to harass or kill?