In the past few weeks, there has been a steady stream of stories highlighting major concerns over scientific evidence relating to climate change. One example has been the world-wide furore relating to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC’s) assertion that all Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035. Going forwards, as the UK Government Chief Scientist Professor John Beddington has stated strongly, standards of openness about sources, verification and presentation must be at the highest level. The most regrettable implication of recent events is that further confusion has been sown amongst global publics about climate change. What I believe most people want now is enlightenment, not further argument, about what might be the gravest issue confronting humanity in the twenty first century. One of the key challenges for scientists and indeed politicians is communicating the reality of climate change to global publics in an accurate and intelligible way. Contrary to belief in some quarters, the leading models that forecast global climate temperature in decades ahead are reliable and this is strongly supported by satellite data. Dismissive views expressed about climate predictions are often based on the uncertainty of long range weather forecasts. […]
Saturday, February 20th, 2010
Implications Of Recent Climate Science Controversies
Author: JULIAN HUNT
Source: Reuters
Publication Date: 02:19 February 18th, 2010
Link: Implications Of Recent Climate Science Controversies
Source: Reuters
Publication Date: 02:19 February 18th, 2010
Link: Implications Of Recent Climate Science Controversies
Stephan: Here is some sensible advice about the ongoing climate change 'debate.' Julian Hunt is visiting professor at Delft University and formerly director general of the UK Meteorological Office.